ANALYSIS ABOUT THE IMPACT OF ‘KABUPATEN APBD’ BUDGET ALLOCATION AGAINST THE POVERTY IN INDONESIA 2006-2009

Dimas Ari Darmantyo

Abstract


This research aims to analyze the impact of APBD/counties/ regency/city budget allocation against the poverty in Indonesia for the period of 2006 – 2009. By using the panel data of 172 regencies/cities, this research has found that the allocation of APBD budgeting is not pro-poor oriented, but it could have the possibility to reduce the poverty level. The result of this research has explained that low rate of the inflation could reduce the poverty level itself.

Keywords:  budgeting allocation, APBD (counties, district, city  budgeting), pro-poor, poverty level. 


Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 58 times| PDF view : 23 times

References


Agrawal, Pradeep. 2007. “Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction: Evidence from Kazakhstan”, Asian Development Review24(2): hal 90 diakses dari www.proquest.com 20 Desember 2010.

Agussalim. 2004. “Sanggupkah Pengeluaran Pemerintah Mereduksi Kemiskinan?”. Diakses dari http://www.scribd.com, 20 September 2010.

Badan Pusat Statistik. Berita Resmi Statistik, Berbagai Tahun. Diakses dari www.bps.go.id 22 Juni 2011.

Barbieri,Laura. 2010. ”Panel Unit Root Test: A Review”. Diakses Melalui www3.unicatt.it 15 Juli 2011.

Dollar, David dan Aart Kraay. 2001. “Growth is Good for The Poor”. Policy Research Working Paper 2587. Diakses Melalui www.worldbank.org 15 Desember 2010.

Fan,Shenggen, Peter Hazell, dan Sakhadeo Thorat.2000. “Government Spending, Growth and Poverty in Rural India”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(4): 1038-1051 diakses di www.jstor.org 4 Agustus 2010.

______, Pham Lan Huong, dan Tring Quang Long.2004a. “Government Spending and Poverty Reduction in Vietnam”. Diakses di www.google.com 14 Agustus 2010

Foster, James, Joel Greer, dan Erik Thorbecke. 1984. “A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measure”. Econoetrica 52(3): 761-766 Diakses di www.jstor.org 19 Maret 2011.

Gujarati,Damodar. 2004. Basic Econometrics, 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill. Singapore.

Hill,Hal. 2000. Indonesian Economy 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Jha, Raghbendra, Bagala Biswal, dan Urvashi D. Biswal. 2001. ’An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Public Expenditures on Education and Health on Poverty in Indian States’. QED Working Paper No.998 diakses di www.google.com 5 Januari 2011

Jung,Suhyun, Seong-Hoon Cho, dan Roland K. Roberts.2009. ‘Public Expenditure and Poverty Reduction in Southern United States.’ Selected Paper for Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting 2009 diakses di www.google.com 14 Agustus 2010.

Kepala Sekretariat TNP2K, 2010. Sosialisasi Peraturan Presiden No 15 Tahun 2010 Tentang Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. Diakses melalui www.tkpk.org 30 Juli 2010

Labaas, Belkacem dan Imed Limam. 2004. ’Impact of Public Policies on Poverty, Income Distribution and Growth’. Diakses di www.google.com 14 Agustus 2010.

Mawardi, Sulton dan Sudarno Sumarto. 2003. ‘Kebijakan Publik yang Memihak Orang Miskin (Fokus: Pro-Poor Budgeting)’. Lembaga Penelitian SMERU.2003 Diakses di www.google.com 21 Oktober 2010.

Mehmood,Rashid dan Sara Sadiq. 2010. ‘The Relationship between Government Expenditure and Poverty:A Cointegration Analysis’. Romanian Journal of Fiscal Policy Vol 1(1):29-37 diakses di www.google.com 6 Desember 2010.

Mubyarto,Martodinoto.2001. ’Poverty in Indonesia Before and After The Crisis’ In ADB (ed) Poverty Reduction: What’s New and What’s Different?’. Asian Development Bank. Diakses dari www.adb.org 2 Juli 2011.

Pbhmi.org, 2010. ‘Pendekatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan’. Diakses Melalui www.google.com 3 Juli 2010.

Ravallion, Martin. dan Monika Huppi. 1989. ‘Poverty and Undernutrition in Indonesia during the 1980s’. Policy, Planning, and Research Working Papers: Agricultural Policy WPS286. Diakses di www.google.com 26 Desember 2011.

_________ ___. dan Gourav Datt. 1999. ‘When is Growth Pro Poor?:Evidence from Diverse Experiences of India’s States’. Policy Research Working Paper 2263. Diakses di www.google.com 24 November 2010.

_________ ___ dan . 2003. ‘What is Needed for More Pro-Poor Growth Process in India?’. Economic and Political Weekly 35(13):1089-1093. Diakses di www.jstor.org 21 Oktober 2010.

_________ ___. 2004. ‘Pro-Poor Growth:A Primer’. Development Research Group. World Bank.

Schiller, Bradley R. 2004. The Economics of Poverty and Discrimination 10th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall:New Jersey.

TKPK (Tim Koordinasi Penanggulangan Kemiskinan). 2009. Capaian Koordinasi Penanggulangan Kemiskinan 2005-2009. Diakses melalui www.tkpkri.org 30 Juli 2010.

TKPK. 2005. Kemiskinan di Indonesia: Perkembangan Data dan Informasi Terakhir. Bab 2. Diakses melalui www.tkpkri.org 30 Juli 2010.

Wie, Thee Kian. 2006. ‘Policies for Private Sector Development in Indonesia’. ADB Institute Discussion Paper No. 46. Diakses melalui www.google.com 26 Desember 2011.

_________ . 2010. ‘A Brief Overview of Economic Growth and Poverty in Indonesia during the New Order and After the Asian Economic Crisis’. In Hardjono, Joan, Nuning Akhmadi, dan Sudarno Sumarto (eds) Poverty and Social Protection in Indonesia. Institute of South East Asian Studies. Pasir panjang, Singapore. Diakses melalui books.google.com 26 Desember 2011.

www.undp.org. Diakses 20 September 2010.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33062/mjb.v1i01.55

Cited By :

EDITORIAL OFFICE
Centre for Research and Community Services
STIE Binaniaga
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Binaniaga
Jl. Raya Pajajaran No. 100 - Bogor 16153
Telp. 0251-8360688  - Fax  0251-8354558
Email : jmngtbinaniaga100@gmail.com, p3m@stiebinaniaga.ac.id

e-ISSN : 2580-149X    p-ISSN : 2527-4317